IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE, CARCINOGENIC AND METASTASE -RELATED EFFECTS OF SOLAR UV RADIATION
Project leader: Christer Jansén, University of Turku,
Department of Dermatology, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland,
tel: +358-2-313 2605, fax: +358-2-313 1610, e-mail: Cjansen@utu.fi
| PUBLICATIONS |
| TIIVISTELMÄ SUOMEKSI |
Researchers:
Dariusz Leszczynski, Radiobiology Laboratory, Department of Research
and Environmental Surveillance, STUK - Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority,
Laippatie 4, FIN-00880 Helsinki, Finland, tel. +358-9-7598 8694, fax: +358-9-7598
8464, e-mail: Dariusz.Leszczynski@stuk.fi
Riikka Pastila, Radiobiology Laboratory, Department of Research and
Environmental Surveillance, STUK - Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority
, Laippatie 4, FIN-00880 Helsinki, Finland, tel. +358-9-7598 8468, fax:
+358-9-7598 8464, e-mail: Riikka.Pastila@stuk.fi
Leena Koulu, Department of Dermatology, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu
4-8, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland, tel. +358-2-313 2600, fax: +358-2-313 1610
e-mail: Leena.Koulu@tyks.fi
Lasse Leino, BioTie Therapies, Turku Technology Center, Biocity, Tykistökatu
6 20520 Turku, Finland, tel. +358-2-274 8914, fax: +358-2-274 8910,
e-mail: Lasse.Leino@biotie.fi
Jarmo Laihia, Department of Dermatology, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu
4-8, 20520 Turku, Finland, tel. +358-2-261 1634, fax: +358-2-313 1610,
e-mail: Jarlai@utu.fi
Financing SYTTY organisation: The Academy of Finland
Funding from SYTTY / Total funding of project (€): 213274
/ 671590
Person-months of work funded by SYTTY / Total person-months of work:
78,5 / 105,6
KEY WORDS: Solar UV, immunosuppression, skin cancer, metastasis,
risk assessment
EXTENDED ABSTRACT
1 Introduction
Epidemiological studies have demonstrated that ultraviolet (UV) radiation induces skin cancers. It has also been realised that UV radiation affects the immune system in ways that are instrumental not only in the development of skin cancer but also in local and systemic infections. Also, it has been demonstrated that UVA radiation may have much more profound physiological effects, both local (skin) and systemic, than previously anticipated. Our project has been launched to provide information of UV-compromised human immune surveillance of skin cancer, in particular malignant melanoma, and to examine the possible effect of UV radiation on tumour metastasis.
UV immune modulation was studied in humans in vivo. We used contact hypersensitivity (CHS) induction to an experimental allergen as a model for cutaneous cell-mediated immunity. In comparison, we studied the molecular mechanisms in human UV immune suppression by an epidermal cell-mediated T cell stimulation assay.
The majority of the biomedical studies on the development of skin cancer have focussed on the effects of UVB radiation (280–320 nm). However, several recent studies have demonstrated that UVA radiation (320–400nm) can modulate biochemical processes in the epidermis and dermis. Thus, we have suggested (Leszczynski D. et al., Photochem Photobiol 1996; 64: 936-942) the possibility that UVA radiation, either alone or in combination with UVB, might alter the metastatic potential of tumour cells passing through dermal capillaries or originating from the skin, by increasing their adhesiveness to the endothelium. The pro-metastatic effects of UVA might not be of significant relevance for the every-day exposures which are low, but UVA may gain prominence during sunbathing or tanning in solaria. Therefore, in this project we have aimed at the elucidation of the possible role of UVA irradiation in the enhancement of tumour cell–endothelial cell interaction. This enhancement of adhesiveness might lead to an increase in binding of UVA-irradiated tumour cells to endothelial lining of vasculature in various internal organs.
2 Methods
2.1. Immunosuppressive effects of solar UV radiation in humans
Healthy volunteers were sensitised with a single topical exposure to
diphenyl cyclopropenone (DPCP) to induce long-lasting cell-mediated immune
reactivity. Sensitisation was clinically tested at a distant skin site.
Blood samples were drawn at fixed time points before and after sensitisation,
T cells were enriched from peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL), and cell
proliferation was tested as a response to DPCP in vitro. The modulation
of epidermal Langerhans cell (LC) function by solar-simulating UV irradiation
(SUV; spectral range 290–400 nm) was examined by irradiating the buttock
skin with a single dose (4 SED; 400 J/m2). Keratome or suction blister
samples taken at fixed time points were dissected into epidermal cell (EC)
suspension. Allogeneic PBL or autologous T cells were incubated with the
EC and recall antigen(s), and the proliferative index was determined by
3H-thymidine incorporation. Also cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) patients
were examined in the CHS induction test, but no blood or skin samples were
taken.
2.2. Effects of UVA radiation on melanoma metastasis
In vitro experiments:
- Cell lines: Mouse B16-F1 and B16-F10 melanoma cell lines, mouse MS-1
endothelial cell line, human Mel-Juso melanoma cell line and human EAhy.926
endothelial cell line.
- Adhesion assay between UVA irradiated melanoma cell line and non-irradiated
endothelial cell line was performed using method of Pauli and Lee (Lab
Invest 1988; 58: 379).
- Expression of cadherin E, N and P on mouse melanoma cell lines and
CD146 antigen on human melanoma cell line were determined by standard flow
cytometry (FACS) and ELISA methods.
- To assess the homotypic interaction between melanoma cells, aggregation
assay was performed where melanoma cells were allowed to form spontaneous
aggregates in culture.
In vivo experiments:
- To validate our in vitro results, the study of experimental lung
metastasis was performed using method by Fidler (Cancer Res 1973; 35: 218).
Briefly, 50 000 melanoma cells were injected into the lateral tail vein
in C57BL/6 mice and mice were exposed to 8 J/cm2 of UVA. Fourteen days
later the mice were killed and the number of surface tumour nodules in
lungs was counted.
- The adhesive properties of B16-F1 cells in vivo were examined at
Wellman Laboratories of Photomedicine (Harvard University, Boston, MA,
USA). Melanoma cells, irradiated with a single dose of UVA at 8 J/cm2,
were injected into the tail vein 24 h after irradiation. Behaviour of injected
melanoma cells in skin capillary circulation of the ear was monitored and
recorded in the living animal using real-time video-rate fluorescence confocal
microscope that was constructed and developed at Wellman Laboratories.
3 Results and Discussion
3.1 Immunosuppressive effects of solar UV radiation in humans
We have earlier observed that epidermal LC up-regulate crucial immune
receptors upon SUV irradiation of the human skin in vivo. To assess the
functional characteristics of LC in the irradiated skin, we used the mixed
epidermal cell-lymphocyte reaction assay. PBL proliferation was suppressed
by 48 % –61 % by allogeneic EC sampled at 3–48 h after SUV in vivo. SUV
induced the expression of CD86 on LC at all time points. Accordingly, expression
of CD25 and CD3 on the responding T cells appeared at the same or elevated
levels. The data show that LC from the human skin exposed to SUV in vivo
can suppress the proliferation response of allogeneic lymphocytes although
the surface receptor expression on the responding T cells is not suppressed.
In similar assays, however, SUV irradiation did not diminish the capacity
of LC to present HSV and PPD recall antigens to enriched autologous T cells.
CD25 and CD69 were induced on T cells in the antigen-presentation reaction.
The two response types thus seem to function via distinct signalling pathways
in local UV immunomodulation.
In our studies on local and distant UV immune modulation, all control subjects could be sensitised to DPCP, when the allergen was applied on nonirradiated skin, and a primary allergic reaction (PAR) developed. Local SUV (600 J/m2) prevented contact sensitisation through the irradiated skin in 11 out of 12 subjects, but it did not induce antigen-specific tolerance; the subjects could be sensitised later through the nonirradiated skin. A single UVB dose given to app. 70 % of body surface area did not prevent contact sensitisation through a distant, nonirradiated skin site (n=10). However, four consecutive minimal perceptible erythemal UVB doses prevented contact sensitisation at a distant skin site in two out of 21 subjects (no PAR at sensitisation site and no elicitation response later). One of these two subjects could not be sensitised to DPCP even later through the nonirradiated skin. This suggests that immunologic tolerance at a distant skin site can be achieved in humans, a phenomenon described earlier in experimental animals only. The basal ability of CMM patients to mount contact allergy to DPCP tended to be diminished as compared to individuals with no history of skin malignancy. The distant immunosuppression found in a small subpopulation of healthy humans could not be demonstrated in CMM patients.
When PBL were challenged with DPCP in vitro, they proliferated, up-regulated the CD25, CD69, and CD86 markers, and showed decreased expression per cell of CD4, CD8, and CD28 antigens. The latter effect was DPCP concentration-dependent. DPCP in 77 µM concentration was found to be the threshold level that blocked proliferation and IL-6 production, and induced apoptosis (annexin-V and propidium iodide with FACS). DPCP reactivity was demonstrable in PBL proliferation and in expression of cell surface components. DPCP seemed to affect signal transduction in T cells via antigen presentation and not via chemical toxicity. We compared the clinical in-vivo sensitisation to in-vitro proliferation and realised that, three weeks after sensitisation, DPCP-specific proliferation was detected only in some of the newly sensitised subjects who responded positively in the clinical skin testing. This showed that cell proliferation was not an adequate parameter to indicate systemic sensitisation to the experimental haptenic allergen. The ELISPOT analysis will be validated as an alternative method.
3.2 Effects of UVA radiation on melanoma metastasis
- In vitro study with mouse cell lines (manuscript
submitted for publication)
We have determined in vitro that UVA irradiation of mouse B16-F1 and
B16-F10 melanoma cells causes increase in melanoma cell adhesiveness to
non-irradiated mouse endothelial monolayers. The single dose of UVA at
irradiance of 8–12 J/cm2 caused statistically significant increase in melanoma
adhesiveness peaking at 24 h after irradiation in both cell lines. The
same dose of UVA radiation, but delivered as four smaller doses separated
by 1-h time-intervals (4 x 2 J/cm2), induced increased B16-F1 melanoma
cells adhesion already at 1-h time-point. This suggests a possible cumulative
effect of multiple doses of UVA irradiation. UVA irradiation induced decline
in the surface expression of E-cadherin and increase in the expression
of N-cadherin in B16-F1cells. This change is a well-known marker of metastatic
melanoma phenotype. The decline in E-cadherin expression was accompanied
by a significant decline in homotypic melanoma-melanoma adhesion (clustering)
that is regulated by E-cadherin. This suggests that, following UVA irradiation,
the strength of adhesion between melanoma cells in the primary tumour might
weaken, which might facilitate detachment and migration of single cells
from the solid tumour mass into capillary circulation.
- In vitro study with human cell lines
Results of the experiments executed using mouse cells are being repeated
with human cell lines. Part of the adhesion and clustering data has been
already obtained. Experiments will be continued and finished in 2002 (internal
STUK funding).
- In vivo study in mice
The physiological significance of the results obtained in vitro is
being confirmed by executing an animal study in vivo. The aim of this study
is to determine whether melanoma cells, i.v. injected into C57BL/6 mice
that were subsequently either non-irradiated or irradiated with 8 J/cm2
or 3 x 8 J/cm2 dose of UVA, formed lung metastases. Total of 160 animals
in 16 groups were used in the study. Two weeks after injection of melanoma
cells animals were sacrificed, and lung, liver, brain and skin samples
were collected to determine the quantity and quality of metastases (lung,
liver, brain) and the effect of UVA radiation (skin). Study will be finished
in 2002 as a part of the Ympäristöterveyden Tutkijakoulu (SYTYKE).
- In vivo confocal microscopy study in mice
Using in vivo confocal microscope it was possible to observe sticking,
rolling and extravasation of the i.v. injected rhodamine-labelled B16-F1
melanoma cells. However, most likely, illumination during microscopic observation
caused a rhodamine-dependent photodynamic reaction in melanoma cells, which
led to enhanced cell extravasation, independently of whether cells were
or were not UVA-treated. Following several attempts to resolve this problem
by altering the labelling method and the amount of illuminating light,
experiments were terminated.
4 Conclusions
- Distant cutaneous immunosuppression to a synthetic allergen can be
induced by SUV in human subjects
- The basal ability of CMM patients to mount contact allergy to DPCP
seems to be diminished as compared to individuals with no history of skin
malignancy
- Local SUV induces B7-2 costimulatory molecule in epidermal Langerhans
cells in vivo, but reduces the capacity of these cells to stimulate allogeneic
lymphocyte proliferation in vitro
- Local SUV in vivo does not affect the capacity of Langerhans cells
to present recall protein antigens to autologous T cells in vitro
- Systemic sensitisation to a synthetic allergen can be indicated by
lymphocyte proliferation and cell surface antigen expression in vitro in
certain unknown conditions only
- UVA irradiation increases the following pro-metastatic properties
of melanoma cells:
- UVA irradiation enhances adhesiveness of melanoma
cells to endothelium
- UVA irradiation down-regulates cadherin E-dependent
homotypic melanoma clustering
- UVA irradiation up-regulates cadherin N expression,
which may facilitate transition of melanoma cells to capillaries